The “Go-Home” for NYC: Shared Housing Tried & Tested

 

Typical street that could house the new building
Typical street that could house the new building
 
1/8
 
A typical 25 foot by 100 foot rowhouse lot in an R5 or 6 zone
A typical 25 foot by 100 foot rowhouse lot in an R5 or 6 zone
 
2/8
 
Fitting a number of 'suites' into the zoning envelope
Fitting a number of 'suites' into the zoning envelope
 
3/8
 
The building has an accessible first floor unit with a stacked duplex above
The building has an accessible first floor unit with a stacked duplex above
 
4/8
 
An accessible floor with 5 bedrooms and a retail unit or office in the front
An accessible floor with 5 bedrooms and a retail unit or office in the front
 
5/8
 
The 3rd floor has a laundry area opening to a terrace; all the suites have bed bunks
The 3rd floor has a laundry area opening to a terrace; all the suites have bed bunks
 
6/8
 
The 4th floor has a large living room that could be shared or partially shared...
The 4th floor has a large living room that could be shared or partially shared...
 
7/8
 
Communal space in the 'Go-Homes' in San Diego
Communal space in the 'Go-Homes' in San Diego
 
8/8
 

The “Go-Home” for NYC: Shared Housing Tried & Tested

Project Team:

Smith & Others, San Diego

Students of the Masters in Real Estate Development program for architects at Woodbury University in Burbank, California

This prototype, based on a shared housing model developed in San Diego by Smith & Others, stacks three housing units on a typical 25 by 100 foot lot which contain a variety of sub-‘suites’. The 15’ tall rooms contain sleeping bunks above the bathrooms to free up general use space.

They are arranged in the traditional fashion two rooms facing the street and two rooms facing the inside of the block on each floor.  Since the sub ‘suites’ are small, averaging 250 square feet, there is a large interior space remaining free to augment the rooms with anti rooms, courtyards, laundries, kitchens and cross ventilation.

Beyond achieving affordability, families and individuals can enjoy, music rooms, workshops, and offices not available in the same way to apartment dwellers. An individual‘s room, where full domain is exercised, may also be a place to invite neighbors to share a specific utility, like space to set up a ping pong table. The plan is flexible allowing optional domain boundaries.  Even a main house kitchen may “belong” to an individual. Experience with this arrangement has demonstrated a real advantage in household order, a common complaint in shared houses.

Watch video of the team's full presentation

Download project PDF



Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *